These cells are present in the human body, but they are concentrated more on the fetus of the womenfolk. The fact is that there are some other types of stem cells that have the capability to create other cells in the human body while the other types can repair or replace some of the damaged tissues or cells in the body.
However, the embryonic stem cells are those that are developed from the egg that comes from the females after the egg has been fertilized by the human sperm.
This is a process that takes about 4 days. The stem cell research on its own simply focuses on investigating the cells that develop certain organisms. Here, they are grown in laboratories where they are tested so as to investigate and ascertain the properties of the cells. The sources of the stem cells are the major area of concern. As much as you can get stem cells from blastocysts fertilized in the lab and not planted in the body of women, the major sources of these are the placenta and aborted female fetuses.
The fact that the major source of these cells to conduct an investigation is the embryo that is aborted after few days of conception or between the 5th and 9th week of pregnancy is the major cause of the ethical, political, moral, social and religious debates for and against the stem cell research.
While we tutor you on issues about stem cell research, we can also help you with a workable thesis generator. We have told you that your stem cell research argumentative essay should focus on the facts mentioned above and must follow the format of any standard argumentative essay.
You have to start the essay by planning it. It is not something you rush into. It is full of arguments, so you have to be ready with points, facts, evidence and examples if you must convince your opponents or get the audience to buy your own opinion.
It is not like an analytical essay where you simply analyze and give your verdict. You set out to convince here. You should start your essays on stem cell research by developing an interest in the topic. When you are picking sides for the argument, pick the area you are most passionate about.
After this, you now explore the topics and conduct the research, during which you make a list of the main points. Make sure that these are written down. When you have the points, go ahead and gather the evidence just as you do in all other best college essays.
You have to ensure that all the strong arguments that will possibly come from the other side are considered and enough counter arguments developed.
Just think about yourself in a position where you are standing face to face with another student arguing about this subject. This will help to position your mind properly when writing a stem cell research argumentative essay.
How it works Price Calculator. Blog Essay Service Stem cell research argumentative essay: Another element of the argument against stem cell research pertains to the problem of playing God. Essentially, the concern here is that with stem cell research, scientists are beginning to delve into a morally dangerous area insofar as they are exploring knowledge that has to do with the very origins of life itself. In the Bible, the opening chapter of Genesis clearly delineates how God created the world and all life within the world see New Jerusalem Bible.
So, if human beings gain knowledge pertaining to the origins of life, then there is a significant moral danger that they will begin to usurp the role of God and themselves become the masters of life. Of course, this is only a problem from the perspective of a religious believer: In America, however, there is an enormous number of traditional religious believers, and the problem of playing God would clearly have a great deal of significance and salience for them.
Moreover, it is worth noting that this line of argument is not necessarily absurd. As James has lucidly demonstrated, the question of faith cannot in fact be determined on purely rational grounds.
Of course, some people may argue otherwise; but this would only mean that they have become so convinced of their own faith that they no longer even recognize it as a faith, believing instead that they are being "objective" whereas it is only other people who are still subject to faith.
For present purposes, the important thing to understand is that the concern regarding playing God is just as logically cogent as the proposition that God does not exist and that there is no problem with playing Him.
It is impossible to rationally prove that these Christian ethics are correct. But, by the same token, it would also be inappropriate to dismiss the concern as completely meaningless. In other words, this is a coherent mode of argumentation, insofar as the people who oppose stem cell research on these grounds are logically on par with those who support research on the basis of different "religious" beliefs. Building off of the previous two elements of the argument against stem cell research, a third element pertains to what can be called the relationship between stem cell research and the culture of life.
As Rice has discussed, the culture of life is predominantly a Catholic religious concept, although it has gained traction with other cultural conservatives within the United States as well; and the concept refers to a general ethos, or attitude, that can be applied to a range of contemporary political issues.
The basic gist of the concept is that all phases of the human lifecycle, from conception to natural death, are sacred, due to the fact that life ought to be given a take by God alone and not by human beings.
This position has implications for a broad range of issues, including abortion, euthanasia, and stem cell research. The point here may not be so much whether or not one believes in God; rather, the point may pertain to what one accepts as one's fundamental ethical criterion. As the philosopher Shestov has argued, there has been an intellectual struggle since the beginning of Western civilization between the idea that life can be controlled and evaluated by reason on the one hand, and accepting life as an a priori given that serves as its own criterion on the other.
The concept of the culture of life ties the issue of stem cell research into a broader constellation of related issues. For example, one could argue that embryos "left over" from fertility treatments should be made available for stem cell research since they would go to "waste" anyway. Such a statement would be horrendous; and if anything, the conclusion that would be implied is not the moral acceptability of embryonic stem cell research but rather the moral unacceptability of fertility treatments that will almost certainly result in the destruction of embryos.
There is nothing inherently incoherent about this train of thought; much the opposite, it holds together in a remarkably cohesive way. The issue, of course, would be that the fundamental premises of the argument are often drawn from faith, which means that the argument is unlikely to meet with general or universal acceptance. One key implication of the discussion above is that the argument against stem cell research is in fact a lucid one within the context of its premises, and that attempts to suggest otherwise are likely motivated not by the coherence of the argument as such but rather by a fundamental disagreement regarding initial premises.
One issue at stake is not all stem cell research is connected to cloning or immoral actions. Some research actually implies the smaller use of stem cells found in adult bodies.
Take stem cell research used in dentistry. This technique is used to help regrow teeth, use stem cells found in bone marrow, and includes studies not attributed to aborted embryos. Moreover, another implication is that it is quite unlikely that disagreements over the morality of stem cell research will ever be resolved on purely rational grounds. This is for the simple reason that the argument against stem cell research just like the argument for stem cell research is ultimately motivated by theological assumptions.
This is not meant to imply a weakness in the argument in favor of stem cell research or the argument against stem cell research; rather, it is virtually inevitable that such assumptions will have to be made whatever one's position , given the nature of the subject matter at hand and the way that the issue touches on some of the most profound mysteries of human existence.
In summary, this essay has discussed the argument against stem cell research; and it has focused on three main elements of the argument. All elements of the argument are animated by fundamental assumptions about the nature of life, of God, and of the role of the human being within the world. These assumptions, however, do not necessarily discredit the argument against stem cell research; and this is because the argument on the other side merely tends to make the converse assumptions, which are equally unjustified on strictly rational grounds.
In short, it can be suggested that whatever position one takes on stem cell research, one's perspective is informed not by reason alone but by one's broader worldview. Essential Readings and Interpretive Essays. Ten Years of Controversy. Ultius Blog, 05 Jan. Click here for more help with MLA citations. Click here for more help with APA citations.
Stem cell research is a controversial issue in America. Stem cells are a primitive cell that can multiply and conform to be any cells. Unfortunately, the best source for stem cells is human fetal tissues/5(7).
Stem cell research is one of the most controversial topics of our day. As you think about writing a persuasive essay, consider the importance of this topic and how emotive it can be to discuss both the arguments for and against. Any embryonic stem cell research essay needs to carefully weigh up the pros and cons, as well as the ethics involved.
Embryonic Stem Cell Research Argumentative Essay Embryonic stem cell research is a highly debated and sensitive topic. Such good can come from researching this technology because many people would benefit from it. Stem cell research and cloning are controversial. Scientists claim medical necessity. Opponents argue it's unethical. This sample expository essay explores the argument against stem cell research.. Arguments against stem cell research and cloning/5(5).
For these reasons they regard Embryonic Stem Cell Research as a modern day “Pandora’s box” and believe that it is better kept “shut”. The “moral status” of an embryo is the centre of the Embryonic Stem Cell Research ethical 5/5(1). Mar 05, · Revealing the most important details for any meaningful stem cell research argumentative essay in different areas where the arguments are necessary/5(59).