Some writers do prefer to present their argument last as they think that it will be the thing remembered the most and so be most effective. The need for a strong backing must be stressed. The final paragraph refers to "all of these reasons" but is weak because the reader is still not sure which reasons to focus on. A new claim has been introduced - that teachers need to have a "say" and it countered by the setting of limits.
It could have been used in support for the writer's position sooner. Stating that uniforms should not be required needs needs something to qualify it and the reader needs reminding because this is, after all, a persuasive essay.
The backing in this final paragraph is logical kids get to choose and adults set limits and is important that there should be no opportunity to question this. Determine which ones are not used and the way in which the writer could This image has been Flagged as inappropriate Click to unflag. Image 1 of 3. Image 2 of 3. For example, explore reasons to pay student-athletes in college.
Write about a current issue like the impact of tablet computers instead of textbooks, or ways to stop school bullying. She is a professional author and college writing teacher, and has published 20 nonfiction books for schools and libraries.
Topics for Satirical Argument Essays. Amazing Topics for a Research Paper. Ideas for a Toulmin Argument. Accessed 14 September Depending on which text editor you're pasting into, you might have to add the italics to the site name. The Toulmin Model of Argumentation. Even after presenting data that acts as the foundation for an argument, you may be asked "How did you get there?
In other words, can you somehow justify the leap from the data you've provided to the claim? Supporting the step between data and the claim is the warrant W. A warrant is distinct from the data and the claim and acts as a bridge between them.
The movement from data to the claim though the use of a warrant forms a Stage 2 argument. You should note that warrants are often implicit i. Smith may then ask why this particular medication. Essentially, you are being requested to supply a warrant for your decision.
Quite simply, you've prescribed this medication because it is effective at lowering blood pressure. One may call into question the validity of the warrant. To demonstrate the validity of the warrant it may be necessary to introduce additional data, information or possibly other arguments as backing B to a warrant. Smith that hydrochlorothiazide will lower her blood pressure. But she may respond "How do you know? Because in my experience it works experience 3.
Because it interferes with a specific biochemical process that will lower blood pressure basic science 4. Because many well designed studies have shown that the drug is effective in lowering blood pressure clinical science. Clearly there is a wide variety of available warrants for use in an argument with some being stronger than others.
With the use of stronger warrants we become more confident in the validity of the argument and are more likely to accept the claim. As most arguments are not absolute in nature, Toulmin introduced qualifiers Q into his model as a way to express the relative strengths of warrants in supporting the conclusions that they justify. If a warrant allows us to unequivocally accept a claim given the appropriate data, we can qualify the claim with "definitely" or "necessarily".
If there is any uncertainty surrounding the warrant we may be forced to qualify the claim with terms such as "probably" or "possibly". By convention the qualifier is considered separate from the warrant. Taking hydrochlorothiazide does not necessarily guarantee that blood pressure will be lowered. In this case we need to qualify our warrant by stating that hydrochlorothiazide is usually effective in lowering blood pressure. A rebuttal R acknowledges limitations of the argument and may be put forward to indicate conditions in which the warrant is not applicable and consequently the conclusion can be overturned.
A rebuttal in the case of Mrs. Smith may be that she is currently on a medication that interacts with hydrochlorothiazide. A more efficacious medication may be suggested and thus act as a rebuttal.
Smith's particular set of values, whatever they may be, prevent her from using the medication. With the introduction of qualifiers and the search for counterclaims and rebuttals, the Toulmin model can be used to analyze more complex Stage 3 and 4 arguments such as those commonly encountered in the practice of medicine.
Sample Toulmin Argument. Now that you have had the chance to learn about Toulmin, it’s time to see what a Toulmin argument might look like. Below, you’ll see a sample argumentative essay, written according to MLA formatting guidelines, with a particular emphasis on Toulmin elements.
Toulmin Model of Argument: The twentieth-century British philosopher Stephen Toulmin noticed that good, realistic arguments typically will consist of six parts.
Toulmin Argumentation is a model of argument which suggests six parts in any argumentative text. These elements include: data, claim, warrants, qualifiers, rebuttals and backing statements. Basically, Toulmin Argument analyzes the aspects of your position paper, for instance, so that you can identify the weak points of your arguments and work on them while further improving your strong points. The Toulmin Method of Argumentation is a complex argumentation structure that allows you to establish your argument while considering your opponents’ points of view.
Toulmin argument paper It has plenty of parkland in well-designated areas ideal for bringing the entire family for camping, hiking, playing, biking and other recreational activities to encourage family bonding and having quality. Political topics like abortion or the death penalty are good fits for a Toulmin argument because they allow you to state your opinion and also have opposing points of view that you can use for the rebuttal portion of the paper.